Open Science ambassadors
Do you have questions on open access or open science that are specific to your discipline? Contact one of our open science ambassadors at the UG faculties.
Are you an enthusiastic and outspoken supporter of open access and open science and would you like to become an ambassador for your faculty or research institute?
Contact us for more information.
Sonja Billerbeck
Assistant Professor
Member of the Young Academy Groningen
Ambassador for Faculty for Science and Engineering
"Knowledge is powerful and the knowledge we create at institutions of higher education should be freely accessible to everyone – at the end it has been financed by the tax payer. We as scientists build on existing knowledge but also the general public, high-school teachers and other educators should be able to access scientific information and educate themselves. The pandemic and associated mistrust and fake news have shown how important it is that everyone gets access to scientific results, likely the most fact-based information that is out there. As such I want to advocate for open access, without it we limit the impact our research can have."
Canan Çakırlar
Assistant Professor
Ambassador for Groningen Institute of Archaeology (GIA) at the Faculty of Arts
"I signed up to be an Ambassador for GIA because I am interested in fostering approaches that enhance the reproducibility and transparency of archaeological data and knowledge. I want researchers at GIA and beyond (including my collaborators in other institutions abroad or heritage workers) to think more thoroughly about the reproducibility of their data, and I would like professors to teach about the importance of open science by teaching it using active learning methods."
Matt Coler
Associate Professor & Research Programme Manager
Ambassador for Campus Fryslân
"I believe that knowledge developed in universities should be freely accessible to everyone, not hidden behind paywalls or commodified. Scientific knowledge should be public. My faculty, Campus Fryslân, is the newest faculty at the University and so is open to taking a fresh approach towards open access. I became an Ambassador to promote them in this mission."
Sarahanne M. Field
Assistant Professor
Ambassador for the Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences
"For me, open science is just how I do research. I am privileged that my past early exposure to open science (in the last year of my bachelor programme in 2013), research context and environment allow this. For others though, engaging with open science is not so easy, and countless staff and students in our faculty need support to help them realise their interest in adopting open science practices, and forming their own thoughts and approaches to the open science movement as a whole. I'm more than happy to be someone who can be called upon to help meet this need for support, and I have amassed enough knowledge and skills that I think I can genuinely function well in the role of OS ambassador. I also am skeptical of blanket OS approaches, and am sensitive to the varying needs different disciplines have when it comes to opening up their research and making it more rigorous. In my mind, OS is a buffet and we should be encouraging researchers to adopt what works for them and not try to do it all. I think my own philosophy of OS is helpful to how I approach the role of ambassador, which is, in part, to increase the adoption of OS in the faculty as much as possible, across as many disciplines as possible - not just the quantitative psychological ones that are usually the first to adopt OS."
Ina Horlings
Professor
Ambassador for the Faculty of Spatial Sciences
"I consider it important that everyone, including non-academics, has access to knowledge without thresholds and paywalls.
Public engagement is one of the pillars of open science. This includes not just valorization and societal impact but also supports participatory research and citizen science, thus acknowledging non-academics as co-creators of new knowledge. "
Robert Inklaar
Professor
Ambassador for the Faculty of Economics and Business
"Too often, research is considered done when it is up on a publisher’s website, often behind a paywall that excludes most outside academia and even many inside. Yet as researchers, I feel that it is our duty to ensure that our research is widely available and easily accessible. A duty to all those others who may benefit, but also to ourselves, to reach the widest audience possible for our research. Working towards open access will be an important step to fulfilling that duty."
Gerard Koppelman
Professor of Pediatric Pulmonology
Ambassador for the UMCG
"Medical research is the main driver of innovation in health care. These innovations should be published, in order to be shared with other doctors and scientists, patients and their families, as well as the society at large. Open science enables every colleague worldwide that he or she can access the work that may benefit their patients. Moreover, we have an obligation to be open to society how we use the valuable funding for research and patient care. Thus, open access is needed."
Marijke Leliveld
Associate Professor, Member of the Young Academy Groningen
Ambassador for the Faculty of Economics and Business
"I believe it is the responsibility of policy makers as well as of the scientific community at large to critically reflect on the status quo of the current publication process. Personally, I feel it is based too much on how the process "used to be" and that there is ample room for improvement with current technologies. We need to actively spur this discussion and being open access ambassador can be beneficial in that."
Panos Merkouris
Tenure Track Professor of Public International Law
Chair in Interpretation & Dispute Settlement in International Law
Ambassador for the Faculty of Law
"Articles, research and information being available only through subscriptions to costly and, by consequence de facto inaccessible to the vast majority of the public, databases, offers nothing more than perpetuate the stereotype of academics residing in their ivory towers. Open Access helps tear down this mythos, and enhances the discussion and engagement not merely with other academics, but with policy makers and the general public. As an open access ambassador, I hope to contribute to this gradual shift towards increased Open Access publication."
Noémi Peter
AssociateProfessor
Ambassador for the Faculty of Economics and Business
"I think that researchers should have an active role in the discussion about open access. I find the accessibility of research results important. I find the quality of research and academic freedom even more important. Thus, I support measures which aim to increase accessibility without hurting academic freedom and the quality of research. For this reason I advocate self-archiving, a.k.a. green open access. This form of open access means that researchers make a copy of their manuscript available online."
Naomi de Ruiter
Assistant Professor
Ambassador for the University College Groningen
"The pillars of Open Science hold much promise, but there are also paradoxical challenges that I believe require more attention. First, Open Access promises to make academic knowledge accessible to society at large. Currently, publishing Open Access too often comes with high fees, which disincentivize smaller academic institutes to publish Open Access (as they may not have the monetary resources to pay these fees). Only when Open Access is truly open and free, will all academic output be accessible to society.
Second, initiatives like Open Data, Community Science and Open Notebooks, aim to stimulate a more transparent and collaborative academia. In practice, however, these initiatives can work to silence the voices of minorities, thus privileging the voices of researchers with more power and of dominant research practices and discourses. This initiative of Open Science can thus sometimes limit diversity and inclusion within the academic community.
I believe it is crucial that we further explore how the initiatives of Open Science can be further developed and improved, so that accessibility, transparency, and inclusivity in science can be truly realized. All voices within the academic community need to be heard, and these voices need to reach all corners of society."
Lorenzo Squintani
Professor of Energy Law
Ambassador for the Faculty of Law
"Science is of mankind not of scientists: all publications coming from scientists should be open access as internal and external dialectic processes are essential to develop science."
Titus Stahl
Associate Professor
Ambassador for the Faculty of Philosophy
"The transition towards open access can only be achieved collectively. Therefore, scholars should join forces and take back control over the publication process. Open access allows scholars to contribute to democratic debates without limitations and the transition towards scholar-run open access journals strengthens academic freedom and researchers’ independence."
Marie-José van Tol
Associate Professor, Ambassador for the UMCG
"I'm convinced that open research practices and being as transparent as possible is how we as scientists collaboratively can make progress in solving complex societal questions. We also have the obligation to make our knowledge available to everyone worldwide and should allow researchers from all around the world to share their knowledge openly. This way, we can become aware of biases in our knowledge and contribute to scientific progress globally. I would also like to ensure that early career researchers, often the motor of open research, are properly recognized and rewarded for their efforts.
In this role I would like to bring open research to all relevant local, national, and international tables, including our research schools, institutes, and national and European science advice mechanisms that I'm involved in."
Todd Weir
Associate Professor History of Christianity and Modern Culture
Ambassador for the Faculty of Religion, Culture and Society
"Open Science is about getting the balance right between two ambitions: to open scientific research to a wider audience and to sustain the ecosystem of academic publishing that has developed over the decades. How in other words, do we really get the knowledge produced at universities into the hands (or smartphones) of non-academic readers and viewers, without undermining the quality and the research networks sustained by traditional journals? Open Science requires scholars to rethink how and for whom they write and it requires institutions to stimulate the modification of existing and the creation of new channels for knowledge transfer."
Last modified: | 28 October 2024 10.42 a.m. |