Skip to ContentSkip to Navigation
About us Latest news News News articles

Onmiddellijke handhaving van de openbare orde of bestuursdwang? Het bevel en de last in historisch en rechtsvergelijkend perspectief

07 June 2012

PhD ceremony: Ms. L.D. Ruigrok, 16.15 uur, Academiegebouw, Broerstraat 5, Groningen

Dissertation: Onmiddellijke handhaving van de openbare orde of bestuursdwang? Het bevel en de last in historisch en rechtsvergelijkend perspectief

Promotor(s): prof. J.G. Brouwer, F.R. Vermeer

Faculty: Law

Ruigrok’s thesis refers to the burgomaster’s competences to immediately enforce public order pursuant to the Dutch Municipalities Act and his power to take a decision containing an instruction under the threat of enforcement action. The form and execution of these two competence systems are very similar; in both cases the unwritten restorative measure (bevel) or decision (last) is physically executed. Over the past decades immediate enforcement of public order by the burgomaster evidently shows a trend toward juridification. Restorative measures to immediately enforce public order are put down in writing nearly by default. For example several days prior to soccer games, demonstrations or public events unwritten emergency restorative measures will be issued in writing. Such unwritten restorative measures thus have become an order within the meaning of the General Administrative Law Act, as is the case with decisions containing an instruction under the threat of enforcement action. Burgomasters occasionally force themselves to try to comply with the requirements of a regular order within the meaning of the General Administrative Law Act. The development of the law in this context is striking in view of Article 5:23 Awb, whereas in this provision the legislator ensures rapid and decisive action in order to enforce public order. With her research Ruigrok has formed a soundly based judgment of the trend regarding the juridification of immediate enforcement of public order, bearing in mind its large impact. She has also determined the situations in which a decision containing an instruction under the threat of enforcement action - and thus a decision containing an instruction under the threat of an astreinte - offers an alternative to the competences to immediately enforce public order.

Last modified:13 March 2020 01.02 a.m.
View this page in: Nederlands

More news

  • 17 July 2024

    Veni-grants for ten researchers in Groningen

    The Dutch Research Council (NWO) has awarded a Veni grant of up to €320,000 each to ten researchers of the University of Groningen and the UMCG. The Veni grants are designed for outstanding researchers who have recently gained a PhD.

  • 01 July 2024

    Collective quizzing to improve knowledge retention

    Nina Mileva, Associate Professor of Public International Law, talks about her mini-quiz recap strategy, called the "Quick Review Quiz.

  • 18 June 2024

    Researchers explain right to demonstrate to all and sundry

    What exactly does the right to demonstrate entail? What may and must the government do in the event of demonstrations, and what rights and obligations do protesters have? Demonstration expert Berend Roorda receives questions on this subject almost...