Skip to ContentSkip to Navigation
About us Latest news News News articles

Cognitive models of decision making. Why precision matters

20 April 2012

PhD ceremony: Ms. S.K. Mehlhorn, 12.45 uur, Academiegebouw, Broerstraat 5, Groningen

Dissertation: Cognitive models of decision making. Why precision matters

Promotor(s): prof. N.A. Taatgen

Faculty: Mathematics and Natural Sciences

Already in the 1970s, Allen Newell warned that verbal theories and simplifying dichotomies are not sufficient to understand human cognition. Yet, underspecified verbal models and binary oppositions still enjoy great popularity. In my thesis I have used the precision provided by computational cognitive models to challenge such simplifying dichotomies. The first part of the thesis centers on a dichotomy that currently receives much attention: Is reasoning based on implicit, automatic, or on explicit, deliberate processes? To study this question we conducted several behavioral experiments in which participants had to generate diagnoses for observed medical symptoms. In the experiments we measured the availability of diagnostic hypotheses in memory as a function of the present and past environment. We then compared the behavioral data to results of different computational models. Our findings suggest that automatic activation processes regulate the availability of diagnostic hypotheses in memory and thereby influence which hypotheses can be used by deliberate reasoning strategies. In the second part of the thesis, we moved on to another currently popular dichotomy: Can decisions better be described by non-compensatory heuristics or by compensatory decision strategies? Again, we compared the results of behavioral experiments to a number of computational models. We found that human data was best fit by models that incorporated non-compensatory as well as compensatory components. We conclude that apparently opposing aspects of cognition, such as automatic and deliberate reasoning, or non-compensatory and compensatory decision making, should better be understood as complementary components of cognition.

Last modified:13 March 2020 12.59 a.m.
Share this Facebook LinkedIn
View this page in: Nederlands

More news

  • 01 April 2025

    NSC’s electoral reform plan may have unwanted consequences

    The new voting system, proposed by minister Uitermark, could jeopardize the fundamental principle of proportional representation, says Davide Grossi, Professor of Collective Decision Making and Computation at the University of Groningen

  • 01 April 2025

    ‘AiNed’ National Growth Fund grant for speeding adoption of AI at SMEs

    Professor Ming Cao receives an ‘AiNed’ Growth Fund grant of EUR 2.4 million for research that will contribute to faster adoption of AI at SMEs in the technical industry in the Netherlands.

  • 01 April 2025

    'Diversity leads to better science'

    In addition to her biological research on ageing, Hannah Dugdale also studies disparities relating to diversity in science. Thanks to the latter, she is one of the two 2024 laureates of the Athena Award, an NWO prize for successful and inspiring...