Steg, prof. dr. Linda
Linda Steg (1965) is hoogleraar omgevingspsychologie. Steg studeerde andragogiek in Groningen en werkte onder meer bij het Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau in Den Haag. In 1996 promoveerde ze aan de RUG op het proefschrift ‘Gedragsverandering ter vermindering van het autogebruik’. Ze richt zich op de interactie tussen mens en omgeving: hoe beïnvloedt de omgeving het gedrag en welzijn van mensen, hoe beïnvloedt de mens de kwaliteit van de natuur en het milieu, en hoe kan milieuvriendelijk gedrag worden voorspeld en bevorderd?
Stegs onderzoek richt zich onder meer op de (gedragswetenschappelijke) verklaring van autogebruik, huishoudelijk energiegebruik, het stimuleren van energiebesparing, de acceptatie van milieubeleid en de effecten van beleid en omgevingscondities op het welzijn. Steg liet zien dat als het om het milieu gaat, mensen zich minder laten leiden door kosten-batenanalyses, feiten en argumenten en meer door normen, waarden en gevoelens. Het onderzoek van Steg helpt beleidsmakers die het gedrag van mensen willen beïnvloeden. In het kader van een groot onderzoek door de European Energy Research Alliance bestudeerde Steg tevens de publieke opinie over schaliegas. Steg was als onderzoeker betrokken bij het advies over milieubeleid en gedrag dat in 2014 aan staatssecretaris Mansveld is aangeboden. In 2017 is Steg benoemd als lid van de KNAW.
In 2020 ontving Steg de Stevinpremie, een van de twee hoogste Nederlandse wetenschappelijke onderscheidingen. De Stevinpremie is een prijs voor een onderzoeker van wie het werk een grote maatschappelijke impact heeft. Steg krijgt 2,5 miljoen euro, te besteden aan wetenschappelijk onderzoek. Steg was een van de hoofdauteurs van het derde IPCC rapport dat in april 2022 verscheen.
Eerder in het nieuws
-
Interview met Steg in EenVandaag (vanaf 2.33, 17 april 2019)
-
Met informatie red je het klimaat niet (interview NRC, 5 april 2019)
Overige video's
2024
Judge,
M., Bouman, T., Steg, L.,
& Bolderdijk, J. W. (2024). Accelerating social
tipping points in sustainable behaviors: Insights from a dynamic
model of moralized social change. One
Earth, 7(5), 759-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.04.004
Post,
J. M. M., Berfu Ünal, A., Veldstra,
J. L., de Waard, D., & Steg,
L. (2024). Acceptability of connected automated
vehicles: Attributes, perceived behavioural control, and perceived
adoption norm. Transportation Research Part F:
Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 102,
411-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2024.03.012
Palomo-Vélez,
G., Perlaviciute, G., Contzen, N.,
& Steg, L. (2024). Are we on the same page?
Understanding value similarity and its impact on public trust in
institutions of the energy sector. Energy Research
and Social Science, 117, Article 103715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103715
Koch,
J., Vringer, K., van der Werff, E., Wilting,
H., & Steg, L. (2024). Circular consumption
to reduce environmental pressure: Potential of behavioural change
in the Netherlands. Sustainable Production and
Consumption, 44, 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.12.009
Grealis,
E., Rau, H., Pacheco, I. M., van der Werff,
E., & Steg, L. (2024). Data
Collection Framework (CircEUlar Deliverable 4.3).
Lozano
Nasi, V., Jans, L., & Steg, L.
(2024). Do I Perceive That We as a Community Can Persist,
Adapt Flexibly, and Positively Transform? The Relationship Between
Collective Transilience and Community-Based Adaptation.
Global Environmental Psychology, 2.
https://doi.org/10.5964/gep.11353
Lozano
Nasi, V., Jans, L., & Steg, L.
(2024). Individual Transilience in the Face of the COVID-19
Pandemic. Journal of Environmental
Psychology, 93, Article 102188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102188
Contzen,
N., Perlaviciute, G., Steg, L.,
Reckels, S. C., Alves, S., Bidwell, D., Böhm, G., Bonaiuto,
M., Chou, L. F., Corral-Verdugo, V., Dessi, F., Dietz, T., Doran,
R., Eulálio, M. D. C., Fielding, K., Gómez-Román,
C., Granskaya, J. V., Gurikova, T., Hernández, B., ...
Sütterlin, B. (2024). Public opinion about solar
radiation management: A cross-cultural study in 20 countries around
the world. Climatic Change,
177(4), Article 65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03708-3
Koponen,
K., Braun, J., Cobo Gutiérrez, S., Evatt, A., Golmen, L.,
Guillén-Gosálbez, G., Hamelin, L., Jenkins, S., Koljonen,
T., Lee, C. Y., Levihn, F., Paul, A. J.,
Perlaviciute, G., Preston Aragonès, M., Reiner, D. M.,
Similä, L., Steg, L., Stoefs, W., Sunny, N.,
& Werner, C. (2024). Responsible carbon dioxide removals
and the EU’s 2040 climate target.
Environmental Research Letters,
19(9), Article 091006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad6d83
Paul
Fesenfeld, L., Zeiske, N., Maier, M., Rachelle
Gallmann, M., Van der Werff, E., & Steg,
L. (2024). Tasting and labeling meat substitute
products can affect consumers’ product evaluations and
preferences. Food Quality and
Preference, 118, Article 105184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105184
Bouman,
T., Steg, L., & Dietz, T. (Accepted/In
press). The public demands more climate action, not less:
Rising political climate opposition does not reflect public
opinion. Climatic Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03832-0
Palomo-Vélez,
G., Perlaviciute, G., Contzen, N.,
& Steg, L. (2024). Trusting the minister or
trusting the mayor? Perceived competence and integrity of central
and local Dutch institutions governing energy matters.
Environmental Research Communications,
6(4), Article 045009. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad3f7d
2023
van
Valkengoed, A. M., Perlaviciute, G.,
& Steg, L. (2024). From believing in climate
change to adapting to climate change: The role of risk perception
and efficacy beliefs. Risk Analysis,
44(3), 553-565. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14193
Feng,
S., Cucuzzella, M., Bouman, T.,
Steg, L., & Scherpen, J. M. A. (2023).
An integrated human-cyber-physical framework for control of
microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Smart
Grid, 14(5), 3388-3400. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2023.3247918
Lozano
Nasi, V., Jans, L., & Steg, L.
(2023). Can we do more than “bounce back”?
Transilience in the face of climate change risks.
Journal of Environmental Psychology,
86, Article 101947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101947
van
Valkengoed, A. M., Steg, L., & de
Jonge, P. (2023). Climate Anxiety: A Research Agenda
Inspired by Emotion Research. Emotion
Review, 15(4), 258-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739231193752
van
Valkengoed, A. M., & Steg, L. (2023).
Climate anxiety is about more than just personal
risks. Nature climate change,
13(7), 591. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01718-0
Judge,
M., Kashima, Y., Steg, L., & Dietz, T.
(2023). Environmental Decision-Making in Times of
Polarization. Annual Review of Environment and
Resources, 48, 477-503. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112321-115339
Steg,
L. (2023). Intrinsic motivation to act
pro-environmentally. In B. Gatersleben, & N. Murtagh
(Eds.), Handbook on Pro-Environmental Behaviour Change
(pp. 28-37). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800882133.00009
Erisman,
J. W., de Coninck, H., Akerboom, S., Blok, K., Haasnoot, M.,
Mulder, M., Peters, W., Pot, W. D., Steg, L.,
Taebi, B., & van den Brink, R. (2023). Met iedereen
de transities in: Richtinggevende keuzes voor een klimaatneutraal
en klimaatbestendig Nederland. Wetenschappelijke
Klimaatraad. https://www.wkr.nl/documenten/rapporten/2023/12/15/adviesrapport-met-iedereen-de-transities-in
Steg,
L. (2023). Psychology of Climate Change.
Annual Review of Psychology, 74,
391-421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032720-042905
van
Valkengoed, A. M., Steg, L., &
Perlaviciute, G. (2023). The psychological distance of
climate change is overestimated. One
Earth, 6(4), 362-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.03.006
Palomo-Vélez,
G., Contzen, N., Perlaviciute,
G., & Steg, L. (2023). Trust in
institutions and public acceptability of risky energy production:
Testing the causal relationships in the context of Groningen
earthquakes. Energy Research and Social
Science, 96, Article 102927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102927
Reintgen
Kamphuisen, F., Bouman, T., & Steg,
L. (2023). Understanding the Dynamics in the
Relationship between Descriptive Norms and Pro-Environmental
Behaviour. Abstract from International Conference of
Environmental Psychology (ICEP) 2023, Aarhus, Denmark.
Vrieling,
L., Perlaviciute, G., & Steg,
L. (2023). When others control risks: Others-focused
coping with risks from energy projects. Risk
Analysis, 43(11), 2211-2222. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14117
2022
Carfora,
V., Zeiske, N., van der Werff, E.,
Steg, L., & Catellani, P. (2022). Adding Dynamic
Norm to Environmental Information in Messages Promoting the
Reduction of Meat Consumption. Environmental
Communication, 16(7), 900-919. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2062019
Steg,
L., Veldstra, J., de Kleijne, K.,
Kılkış, Ş., Lucena, A. F. P., Nilsson, L. J.,
Sugiyama, M., Smith, P., Tavoni, M., de Coninck, H., van Diemen,
R., Renforth, P., Mirasgedis, S., Nemet, G., Görsch,
R., Muri, H., Bertoldi, P., Cabeza, L. F., Mata, É.,
... Vérez, D. (2022). A method to identify barriers to
and enablers of implementing climate change mitigation
options. One Earth, 5(11),
1216-1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.10.007
Bouman,
T., & Steg, L. (2022). A spiral of
(in)action: Empowering people to translate their values in climate
action. One Earth, 5(9),
975-978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.08.009
Geiger,
J., van der Werff, E., Ünal,
B., & Steg, L. (2022). Context
matters: The role of perceived ease and feasibility vis-à-vis
biospheric values in recycling behaviour.
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Advances, 16, Article 200122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2022.200122
Sharpe,
E., Ruepert, A., van der Werff, E., &
Steg, L. (2022). Corporate environmental
responsibility leads to more pro-environmental behavior at work by
strengthening intrinsic pro-environmental motivation.
One Earth, 5(7), 825-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.06.006
Creutzig,
F., Niamir, L., Bai, X., Callaghan, M., Cullen, J.,
Díaz-José, J., Figueroa, M., Grubler, A., Lamb, W. F.,
Leip, A., Masanet, E., Mata, É., Mattauch, L., Minx, J. C.,
Mirasgedis, S., Mulugetta, Y., Nugroho, S. B., Pathak, M., Perkins,
P., ... Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2022). Demand-side solutions
to climate change mitigation consistent with high levels of
well-being. Nature climate change,
12(1), 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01219-y
Ünal,
A. B., Pals, R., Steg, L., Siero, F. W., &
van der Zee, K. I. (2022). Is virtual reality a valid tool
for restorative environments research? Urban
Forestry and Urban Greening, 74, Article
127673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127673
van
Valkengoed, A. M., Perlaviciute, G.,
& Steg, L. (2022). Relationships between climate
change perceptions and climate adaptation actions: policy support,
information seeking, and behaviour. Climatic
Change, 171, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03338-7
Palomo-Velez,
G., Perlaviciute, G., Contzen, N., & Steg,
L. (2022). SketchNote Responsible decision-making on
gas. Unpublished. Digital or Visual Products
Corker,
E., Mitev, K., Lewis, A. N., Tamis, M., Bouman, T.,
Holmlid, S., Lambe, F., Michie, S., Osborne, M., Renes, R.
J., Steg, L., & Whitmash, L. (2022). The
impact of COVID-19 related regulations and restrictions on mobility
and potential for sustained climate mitigation across the
Netherlands, Sweden and the UK: A data-based commentary.
UCL Open Environment, 4(3), Article
03. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444/ucloe.000032
Fisher,
S. D., Kenny, J., Poortinga, W., Böhm, G., & Steg,
L. (2022). The politicisation of climate change
attitudes in Europe. Electoral
Studies, 79, Article 102499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102499
Goedkoop,
F., Sloot, D., Jans, L., Dijkstra,
J., Flache, A., & Steg, L.
(2022). The Role of Community in Understanding Involvement in
Community Energy Initiatives. Frontiers in
Psychology, 12, Article 775752. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.775752
Liu,
L., Vrieling, L., Perlaviciute,
G., Bouman, T., & Steg, L.
(2022). The role of trust in public acceptability of energy
projects: Integrity versus competence.
Environmental Research Communications,
4(3), Article 035003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ac5718
van
Valkengoed, A. M., Abrahamse, W., & Steg,
L. (2022). To select effective interventions for
pro-environmental behaviour change, we need to consider
determinants of behaviour. Nature Human
Behaviour, 6, 1482–1492. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01473-w
Lemmen,
N., Steg, L., & Bouman, T.
(2022). When you choose but not lose: Decreasing
people’s desire for options on technological
appliances. Frontiers in Psychology,
13, Article 749772. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.749772
2021
Bouman,
T., & Steg, L. (2023). Worrying about
the consequences of COVID-19 for distant others relates to
mitigative actions. Health
Communication, 35(5), 902-912. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1981564
Cucuzzella,
M., Bouman, T., Kosaraju, K. C.,
Schuitema, G., Lemmen, N., Johnson-Zawadzki, S.
J. Z., Fischione, C., Steg, L., &
Scherpen, J. M. A. (2022). Distributed control of DC
grids: Integrating prosumers’ motives. IEEE
Transactions on Power Systems, 37(4),
3299-3310. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3109024
Vrieling,
L., Perlaviciute, G., & Steg,
L. (2021). Afraid, angry or powerless? Effects of
perceived risks and trust in responsible parties on emotions
towards gasquakes in the Netherlands. Energy
Research and Social Science, 76, Article
102063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102063
Perlaviciute,
G., Steg, L., & Sovacool, B. K. (2021).
A perspective on the human dimensions of a transition to
net-zero energy systems. Energy and Climate
Change, 2, Article 100042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2021.100042
Steg,
L., Perlaviciute, G., Sovacool, B. K.,
Bonaiuto, M., Diekmann, A., Filippini, M., Hindriks,
F., Bergstad, C. J., Matthies, E., Matti, S., Mulder,
M., Nilsson, A., Pahl, S., Roggenkamp, M.,
Schuitema, G., Stern, P. C., Tavoni, M., Thøgersen, J.,
& Woerdman, E. (2021). A Research Agenda to Better
Understand the Human Dimensions of Energy Transitions.
Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-11.
Article 672776. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672776
Lozano
Nasi, V., Jans, L., & Steg, L.
(2021). Can we do more than 'bounce back'? Transilience
in the face of climate change risks. Poster session
presented at Kurt Lewin Institute Conference .
Lozano
Nasi, V., Jans, L., & Steg, L.
(2021). Can We Do More Than "Bouncing Back"? Development
and Validation of the Climate Change Transilience
Scale. Abstract from International Conference on
Environmental Psychology, Siracusa, Italy.
Veldstra,
J., Ünal, B., & Steg, L.
(2021). Car Ownership and Car Use: A Psychological
Perspective. In R. Vickerman (Ed.), International
Encyclopedia of Transportation (1st ed.). Elsevier.
van
Valkengoed, A., Perlaviciute, G., &
Steg, L. (2021). Climate change perceptions as
general antecedents of climate adaptation behaviour.
Abstract from Society for Personality and Social Psychology
Sustainability Preconference.
Venhoeven,
L. A., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L.
(2021). Corrigendum to “Why going green feels
good.” [Journal of Environmental Psychology (2020), Volume
71, 101492]. Journal of Environmental
Psychology, 75, Article 101616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101616
van
Valkengoed, A. M., Steg, L., &
Perlaviciute, G. (2021). Development and validation of
a climate change perceptions scale. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 76, Article 101652.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101652
Bhushan,
N., Steg, L., Jans, L., &
Albers, C. (2021). Does installing photovoltaic panels
affect daily electricity usage patterns? A generalized additive
model approach. Energy and Climate
Change, 2, Article 100052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2021.100052
Contzen,
N., Handreke, A. V., Perlaviciute, G.,
& Steg, L. (2021). Emotions towards a mandatory
adoption of renewable energy innovations: The role of psychological
reactance and egoistic and biospheric values.
Energy Research and Social Science,
80, Article 102232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102232
Contzen,
N., Perlaviciute, G., Sadat-Razavi, P.,
& Steg, L. (2021). Emotions Toward Sustainable
Innovations: A Matter of Value Congruence.
Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article
661314. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661314
Bouman,
T., van der Werff, E., Perlaviciute,
G., & Steg, L. (2021). Environmental
values and identities at the personal and group level.
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences,
42, 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.022
Judge,
M., de Hoog, O., Perlaviciute, G.,
Contzen, N., & Steg, L. (2021). From
toilet to table: Value-tailored messages influence emotional
responses to wastewater products. Biotechnology
for Biofuels, 14(1), Article 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-01931-z
Bouman,
T., Steg, L., & Perlaviciute,
G. (2021). From values to climate action.
Current Opinion in Psychology, 42,
102-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.010
Wang,
X., van der Werff, E., Bouman,
T., Steg, L., & Harder, M. K. (2021).
I Am vs. We Are: How Biospheric Values and Environmental
Identity of Individuals and Groups Can Influence Pro-environmental
Behaviour. Frontiers in Psychology,
12, Article 618956. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618956
Sloot,
D., Jans, L., & Steg, L. (2021).
Is an Appeal Enough? The Limited Impact of Financial,
Environmental, and Communal Appeals in Promoting Involvement in
Community Environmental Initiatives.
Sustainability, 13(3), 1-30. Article
1085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031085
Brosch,
T., & Steg, L. (2021). Leveraging emotion
for sustainable action. One Earth,
4(12), 1693-1703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.11.006
Bouman,
T., Steg, L., & Zawadzki, S.
J. (2021). Meta-analytic evidence for a robust and
positive association between individual’s pro-environmental
behaviors and their subjective wellbeing. 96. Abstract
from 2021 International Society of Political Psychology Annual
Meeting, Montreal, Canada.
van
der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Ruepert, A.
(2021). My company is green, so am I: the relationship
between perceived environmental responsibility of organisations and
government, environmental self-identity, and pro-environmental
behaviours. Energy Efficiency,
14(5), Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-021-09958-9
Sharpe,
E. J., Perlaviciute, G., & Steg,
L. (2021). Pro-environmental behaviour and support for
environmental policy as expressions of pro-environmental
motivation. Journal of Environmental
Psychology, 76, Article 101650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101650
Palomo-Vélez,
G., Perlaviciute, G., Contzen,
N., & Steg, L. (2021). Promoting
energy sources as environmentally friendly: does it increase public
acceptability? Environmental Research
Communications, 3(11), Article 115004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ac32a8
Zeiske,
N., van der Werff, E., & Steg,
L. (2021). The effects of a financial incentive on
motives and intentions to commute to work with public transport in
the short and long term. Journal of Environmental
Psychology, 78, Article 101718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101718
Liu,
L., Bouman, T., Perlaviciute,
G., & Steg, L. (2021). The more
public influence, the better? The effects of full versus shared
influence on public acceptability of energy projects in the
Netherlands and China. Energy Research &
Social Science, 81, Article 102286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102286
van
Valkengoed, A. M., Steg, L.,
Perlaviciute, G., Schultz, P. W., Brosch, T., Gatersleben,
B., Nordlund, A., Pahl, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2021).
Theory enhances impact. Reply to: ‘The case for
impact-focused environmental psychology’.
Journal of Environmental Psychology,
75, Article 101597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101597
Perlaviciute,
G., Görsch, R., Timmerman,
M., Steg, L., & Vrieling, L.
(2021). Values in the backyard: The relationship between
people’s values and their evaluations of a real, nearby
energy project. Environmental Research
Communications, 3(10), Article 105004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ac25d0
van
Valkengoed, A., Perlaviciute, G., &
Steg, L. (2021). When and why are climate change
perceptions associated with adaptation behaviour? The role of risk
perception and efficacy.
2020
Bouman,
T., & Steg, L. (2022). Engaging city
residents in climate action: Addressing the personal and group
value-base behind residents' climate actions.
Urbanisation, 7(1 suppl.), S26 -
S41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455747120965197
Bouman,
T., Steg, L., & Dietz, T. (2021).
Insights from early COVID-19 responses about promoting
sustainable action. Nature
sustainability, 4, 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00626-x
Zeiske,
N., Venhoeven, L., Steg, L., & van
der Werff, E. (2021). The Normative Route to a
Sustainable Future: Examining Children's Environmental Values,
Identity and Personal Norms to Conserve Energy.
Environment and Behavior, 53(10),
1118-1139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916520950266
Gorsira,
M., Huisman, W., Denkers, A., & Steg, L. (2021).
Why Dutch officials take bribes: A toxic mix of
factors. Crime, Law and Social Change,
75(1), 45-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-020-09919-w
Lemmen,
N., Keizer, K., Bouman, T.,
& Steg, L. (2020). Convince Yourself to Do the
Right Thing: The Effects of Provided Versus Self-Generated
Arguments on Rule Compliance and Perceived Importance of Socially
Desirable Behavior. Frontiers in
Psychology, 11, Article 613418. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613418
Langley,
M. G., Bouman, T., & Steg, L.
(2020). De waarden achter klimaatgedrag: Hoe persoonlijke
waarden en waargenomen groepswaarden klimaatgedrag motiveren en
versterken. Mens en Maatschappij,
95(3), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.5117/MEM2020.3.002.GERD
Liu,
L., Bouman, T., Perlaviciute,
G., & Steg, L. (2020). Effects of
competence- and integrity-based trust on public acceptability of
renewable energy projects in China and the Netherlands.
Journal of Environmental Psychology,
67, Article 101390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101390
Verschoor,
M., Albers, C., Poortinga, W., Bohm, G.,
& Steg, L. (2020). Exploring relationships between
climate change beliefs and energy preferences: A network analysis
of the European Social Survey. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 70, Article 101435.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101435
Johnson-Zawadzki,
S., Steg, L., & Bouman, T.
(2020). Meta-analytic evidence for a robust and positive
association between individuals' pro-environmental behaviors and
their subjective wellbeing. Environmental Research
Letters, 15(12), Article 123007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc4ae
Bouman,
T., & Steg, L. (2020). Motivating
Climate Action. IAAP Bulletin,
2(3), 13-16.
Liu,
L., Bouman, T., Perlaviciute,
G., & Steg, L. (2020). Public
participation in decision making, perceived procedural fairness and
public acceptability of renewable energy projects.
Energy and Climate Change, 1,
Article 100013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2020.100013
Fiorini,
L., Steg, L., & Aiello, M.
(2020). Sustainability Choices when Cooking Pasta. In
Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on
Future Energy Systems (pp. 161-166). ACM Press Digital
Library. https://doi.org/10.1145/3396851.3397698
Sargisson,
R. J., De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg,
L. (2020). The Relationship Between Sociodemographics
and Environmental Values Across Seven European Countries.
Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article
2253. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02253
Bouman,
T., Steg, L., & Johnson-Zawadzki,
S. (2020). The value of what others value: When
perceived biospheric group values influenceindividuals’
pro-environmental engagement. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 71, Article 101470.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101470
Zawadzki,
S. J., Bouman, T., Steg, L.,
Bojarskich, V., & Druen, P. B. (2020). Translating
climate beliefs into action in a changing political
landscape. Climatic Change,
161(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02739-w
Bouman,
T., Verschoor, M., Albers, C.,
Böhm, G., Fisher, S. D., Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L.,
& Steg, L. (2020). When worry about climate change
leads to climate action: How values, worry and personal
responsibility relate to various climate actions.
Global Environmental Change, 62,
Article 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102061
Venhoeven,
L. A., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L.
(2020). Why going green feels good. Journal
of Environmental Psychology, 71, Article
101492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101492
2019
Namazkhan,
M., Albers, C., & Steg, L.
(2020). A decision tree method for explaining household gas
consumption: The role of building characteristics,
socio-demographic variables, psychological factors and household
behaviour. Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews, 119, Article 109542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109542
Vrieling,
L., Perlaviciute, G., & Steg,
L. (2019). Acceptability of wind energy: the role
of trust and emotions. Abstract from International
Conference on Environmental Psychology, Plymouth, United
Kingdom.
Geiger,
J. L., Steg, L., van der Werff,
E., & Ünal, A. B. (2019). A
meta-analysis of factors related to recycling.
Journal of Environmental Psychology,
64, 78-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.05.004
van
Valkengoed, A. M., & Steg, L. (2019).
Climate change adaptation by individuals and households:
A psychological perspective. University of
Groningen.
Poortinga,
W., Whitmarsh, L., Steg, L., Böhm, G., &
Fisher, S. (2019). Climate change perceptions and their
individual-level determinants: A cross-European analysis.
Global Environmental Change, 55,
25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.007
van
Valkengoed, A., Steg, L., &
Perlaviciute, G. (2019). Developing and validating
a climate change perceptions scale. Abstract from
International Conference on Environmental Psychology, Plymouth,
United Kingdom.
Venhoeven,
L., & Steg, L. (2019). Die Bedeutung der
Umweltpsychologie für die Naturtherapie. In H. G.
Petzold , B. Ellerbrock, & R. Hömberg (Eds.), Die
Neuen Naturtherapien: Handbuch der Garten-, Landschafts-, Wald- und
Tiergestützten Therapie, Green Care und Green Meditation
(pp. 179-186). Aisthesis Verlag.
Cucuzzella,
M., Kosaraju, K. C., Bouman, T.,
Schuitema, G., Johnson-Zawadzki, S., Fischione,
C., Steg, L., & Scherpen, J. M. A.
(2019). Distributed control of DC grids: integrating
prosumers motives. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.07341
Liu,
L., Bouman, T., Perlaviciute,
G., & Steg, L. (2019). Effects of
trust and public participation on acceptability of renewable energy
projects in the Netherlands and China. Energy
Research and Social Science, 53, 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.006
de
Leij, L., Perlaviciute, G., Vrieling,
L., Steg, E., Bröring, H.
E., Zuidema, C., Eikenaar, E., de Vries,
J., Heite, A., Gritter, G. (Ed.), &
Smit, F. (Ed.) (2019). Gaswinning, aardbevingen en
wat nu? Symposium van het Groninger Universiteitsfonds ter
gelegenheid van de uitreiking van de Ubbo Emmius-penning aan
Annemarie Heite, 15 november 2018. Rijksuniversiteit
Groningen en Groninger Universiteitsfonds.
Muinos,
G., & Steg, L. (2019). Green and
protective backyards: predicting adaptive behaviors.
Paper presented at International Conference on Environmental
Psychology, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Sloot,
D., Jans, L., & Steg, L. (2019).
In it for the money, the environment, or the community?
Motives for being involved in community energy initiatives.
Global Environmental Change, 57,
Article 101936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101936
van
Valkengoed, A. M., & Steg, L. (2019).
Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation
behaviour. Nature climate change,
9(2), 158-163. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0371-y
Peters,
A. M., van der Werff, E., & Steg, L.
(2019). Mind the gap: The implications of not acting in line
with your planned actions after installing solar
photovoltaics. Frontiers in
Psychology, 10, Article 1423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01423
| Laatst gewijzigd: | 18 juli 2024 08:40 |
View this page in: English